Lorem Ipsum

"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit..."

"Nor is there anyone who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."

— Cicero, De finibus bonorum et malorum, 45 BC

Here is a fact I find almost unbearably beautiful.

The grey filler text that has sat underneath every unfinished layout for sixty years — the lorem ipsum dolor sit amet you have skimmed past ten thousand times without reading — is a mangled fragment of Cicero's treatise on the ends of good and evil. The word "lorem" is not a word. It is the amputated tail of dolorem. Pain.

A Latin scholar named Richard McClintock traced this in the 1980s, chasing the unusual word consectetur back through the centuries. Somewhere in the 1500s, an anonymous typesetter took a passage about why humans sometimes choose suffering in pursuit of something greater, chopped the head off the first word, scrambled the rest, and used the wreckage to show clients what a page of type would look like.

We took the oldest surviving argument about what makes a life worth living, and we used it as texture.

Greeking

The technical term is greeking — from "it's all Greek to me." The purpose of lorem ipsum is not to communicate. Its purpose is to occupy space with the right density. Latin has roughly the same distribution of word lengths as English, roughly the right vowel-to-consonant ratio, roughly the right visual rhythm on the page. It looks like language from three feet away and dissolves into nonsense at one foot.

This is a precision instrument. It was refined over centuries and then industrialised — Letraset dry-transfer sheets in the 1960s, then Aldus PageMaker in the 1980s, which shipped it into the digital era where it has lived ever since, a Ciceronian ghost haunting every wireframe on earth.

And here is the crucial thing about it: its illegibility is its ethics.

Lorem ipsum is an honest lie. Everyone in the room knows it's fake. The designer knows. The client knows. Nobody has ever accidentally shipped lorem ipsum believing it said something. (Well — occasionally somebody has, and it's always a scandal, precisely because the text announces its own emptiness so loudly.)

The placeholder's job is to be obviously provisional. It says: the real thing goes here, and I am not it, and you can see that I am not it. It holds a space open by refusing to fill it. It is a promise of future meaning, made in the register of visible meaninglessness.

That's a remarkably sophisticated social contract, hiding in plain sight in your design software.

The placeholder learns to read

That contract is now broken.

We have built machines that generate text with the right density and the right semantics. Text that doesn't dissolve at one foot. Text that holds up under reading — coherent, grammatical, structured, plausible — and yet has no one behind it who meant it.

This is lorem ipsum that reads.

I don't say this as a complaint about AI writing, which I use daily and which has taught me things about my own sentences. I say it as an observation about a category collapse. For five hundred years we had a clean distinction between filler and content, and the distinction was maintained by a simple technical fact: making convincing text was expensive. Making texture was cheap. So the two things looked different.

Now they cost the same. And so they look the same.

The consequence is not that we are drowning in fake writing. The consequence is that we have lost the ability to see the placeholder as a placeholder — which means we've lost the ability to know when we're standing in front of an unfinished page.

We were greeking all along

Before we get too romantic about this, we should admit something uncomfortable.

An enormous share of the text produced by our civilisation was already lorem ipsum. It just took longer to make.

The corporate mission statement. The consultancy deck that says "leverage synergies across the value chain." The SEO article about the ten best air fryers of 2023. The compliance disclosure nobody has ever read. The LinkedIn post congratulating someone on a new role. The scientific paper padded to publication length. These were all texture — words placed to occupy semantic space at the right density, produced by humans who did not mean them, read by humans who did not read them.

We were greeking each other for decades. We just used slow, expensive, biological typesetters.

What LLMs did was not introduce meaninglessness into writing. They exposed how much of writing was already meaningless, by making the meaningless part free. The machine didn't replace the writer. It replaced the part of the writer that was pretending.

This is, if you squint, good news. A great deal of human misery consisted of people being paid to generate lorem ipsum with a straight face at 2am. Let the machines do it. Nobody should love pain itself, simply because it is pain.

The only defence is idiosyncrasy

But the collapse leaves us with a real problem, and it's not the one people usually name.

The problem is not detection. We will not solve this with watermarks and classifiers, any more than we solved spam with filters — it's an arms race between two systems made of the same stuff. The problem is that we now have no reliable signal for intention.

And I think there's only one signal that survives: particularity.

Lorem ipsum works because it is average. It has to be. Its whole function is to represent the general case of text — the mean word length, the median rhythm, the expected shape. It is the statistical centre of language, rendered visible.

Which means that anything sufficiently off-centre cannot be greeked. You cannot fill a space with the specific memory of your grandmother's kitchen. You cannot placeholder a genuinely strange analogy, a real number from your own bank statement, a joke that only works because of who you are. The weird is unfakeable not because machines can't produce weirdness — they can produce infinite weirdness — but because weirdness anchored to a particular life has a provenance you can check.

The future of writing that matters is not going to be defended by proving a human typed it. It's going to be defended by being so specific, so rooted in one strange life in one strange body at one strange moment, that the question of who typed it becomes obvious and uninteresting. This is the same reason The Future Belongs To The Weird — normalcy is now the cheapest commodity on earth.

Write things that would be absurd as placeholders. That's the whole strategy.

What Cicero was actually saying

The passage we butchered is worth recovering.

Cicero is arguing against the idea that pleasure is the highest good. Nobody, he says, seeks pain for its own sake. But sometimes — often — a person will undertake real toil and real difficulty because on the other side of it lies something worth having. Ut labore et dolore magna aliquam quaerat voluptatem. That he may obtain some great pleasure through labour and pain.

That clause is in your lorem ipsum. It has been sitting in the middle of every unfinished website for decades, garbled, waiting.

We removed the toil from writing, and what we got back was the filler. This shouldn't surprise us. The toil was never overhead — the toil was the part where the meaning got made. The struggle to find the sentence is not a tax on having something to say. It is the mechanism by which you find out what you have to say.

So here's my proposal, and it's not a technical one.

Keep something in your work that costs you. Not for masochism, and not out of nostalgia for the typewriter. But because cost is now the only remaining watermark. Because the space where the real thing goes has to be filled by someone who actually went and got it.

Otherwise it's all dolorem with the head cut off. Pain, mangled, holding a space open for a meaning that never arrives.

On the off chance you'd like to subscribe to my writing, please feel free to subscribe on twitter or use this RSS feed. Thank you.